Archive for December, 2005

Stepping Back to Wired

December 16, 2005

I’ve been trying to find a decent solution to a headset for my PDA phone. Because the built-in Bluetooth (BT) on my phone (a Siemens SX66 or a HTC Blue Angel (generically)) sucks, I’ve been using a Jabra A210 … and it’s much more powerful than the built-in BT so it’s much more reasonable.

But yesterday I went into a Starbucks and the call quality was terrible. I don’t usually make calls from coffee shops, but this time I did.

Why the bad sound quality in the headset (lots of static and weak signal)? It occurred to me that Starbucks has wi-fi. Both Bluetooth and 802.11b/g use the 2.4 GHz frequency range. Thus, they interfere with each other. I have noticed the same thing at home, where I run an 802.11g network … my BT headset can be really poor in certain spots of the house (where the wi-fi must be really good!).

The only headset that works consistently? A wired one. The Plantronics MX300. I like it because it’s retractable. I don’t like it because … well, it’s wired. But it seems like I don’t have much choice. At more and more coffee shops and places in general have wi-fi, there’s very little that can be done. I’m most likely going to take a step back to wired.

Technorati Tags : , ,

Privacy on the Web: Is it Possible Any Longer?

December 11, 2005

I was watching an episode of C.S.I. last week. The episode was called “Still Life”, and besides the fact that I figured out the “crime” in less than 30 seconds after the woman started to scream (my wife can confirm this), it occurred to me after the episode just how potentially unsafe it can be to post pictures and information about yourself on the Internet. In the episode, the woman (stop reading here if you haven’t seen the episode) created a fantasy life with a child for herself, by downloading pictures of someone else’s child from the Web and editing pictures so that she had family snapshots together with the child.

Now, this alone was unsettling, and actually caused my wife to remove any pictures she had of herself on the Web. The only things left are in photo accounts that aren’t publically accessible. But it was this story about a new company, Riya, that really caught my attention. And these excerpts in particular:

The service currently only searches photos uploaded to its servers. The technology could, however, be deployed across the internet, allowing people to search the web, Flickr, Tribe and Friendster photo sets, regardless of whether the owner or the person photographed wants to be identified. That’s where things get interesting.

In the analog days, when you left your house, there was always a possibility that you might run into someone who would remember what you were doing, and tell anyone who cared enough to ask. In a digital world, you do not know if someone is taking your picture — with a camera, a webcam or a cell phone — and the image can be stored forever and searched by people you do not know, at any point in time, without your knowledge and at little or no cost to the searcher.

Riya has a tart answer to user privacy concerns. If you do not want to be indexed, do not let anyone post any photos of you. This is easier said than done. Also, the response falsely assumes that being seen has the same privacy implications as being identified. It does not.

So, as I said, this is really an issue for me. And for my wife. And it should be an issue for anyone who feels like they have a reasonable assurance of privacy if they don’t hand their pictures out to anyone.

Like I said, after seeing the C.S.I. episode my wife took all her pictures off the web. After reading the Riya story I did so as well. Perhaps you should think about it also.

Technorati Tags : ,

Microsoft to End Use of PVCs by End of the Year

December 7, 2005

Microsoft has announced it will end cease using polyvinyl chloride plastic by the end of this year. I certainly applaud this, though I’m sure it will bearly dent the list of toxins we put into the Earth, but it’s still worthy of mention.

Heating My House With My PC

December 5, 2005

Aaron McKenna has an interesting op-ed piece in TG Daily. Or at least it started out that way before it developed into a piece about the Season of Sharing we’re entering.

At any rate, it reminded me of an article I was featured in last year (San Francisco Chronicle), about how hot PCs have become and how hot, in particular, my office has become. Interestingly, I have no reason to heat my office, despite the fact that the rest of my house is rapidly sucking up natural gas. I keep a PC on most of the time, and it’s not even a particularly fast one (1.7 GHz P4, 768 MB of RAM), yet the temperature in that room doesn’t drop below 65 degrees even on a cold night. And I keep the heating vents shut in that office.

And when I turn on my gaming PC … whew. Even on a cold day the temperature in that room can get to 75 or higher. All that heat is wasted efficiency. People talk about water cooling, but water cooling still has to vent the heat somewhere … my office, of course. And that’s not even an up-to-date PC. Sure, it has 2 GB of RAM, but it’s 3 years old and still using AGP, P4, 3GHz. Pretty old stuff by now.

I’m wondering just how much of a blast furnace that office of mine will become when I update to something current. The thought makes me want to break out shorts in the dead of winter. I’m hoping the new CPUs by Intel and some of the newer AMD stuff might mean I won’t have to, but …

Technorati Tags : ,

Choosing an Anti-Virus Program

December 1, 2005

Viruses, trojans, spyware. All of these fit under the general term of malware, software designed to damage a user’s computer. But how to choose a package? There are many antivirus vendors; which one should you use?

Note: most vendors have a subscription model nowadays … you buy the software and have to renew either the program, or the virus update subscription … or both, after a year for a fee.

Do You Need a Firewall? Well, Windows XP has a firewall built-in … it’s simple, but it works. I wouldn’t think you need to buy a different firewall. Also, if, like many people, you use a router with your broadband connection, you shouldn’t need to use a firewall as hackers won’t be able to get past the router … unless you open up a lot of ports, that is.

The Big 2

The safe (?) choices would be the biggest companies … the ones that most people have heard of. Those would be McAfee VirusScan and Symantec Antivirus. Both of these vendors offer security suites that include spyware detection and firewalls. Since these are considered the big 2, they are the safe choice. And, in fact, both do a good job of securing your system.

Negatives? Symantec Antivirus is notoriously heavy. It uses a lot of resources, and will bog down slower systems. Additionally, Symantec requires activation of its products … personally, aside from Windows XP, which leaves me little choice, I refuse to buy products that require activation. The initial problems Symantec had with activation shows why.

As far as McAfee goes, I used to use it, and it was very light on resources. But I don’t like its use of ActiveX technology. Obviously the use of ActiveX in an antivirus product shouldn’t open vulnerabilities, but since ActiveX has such a bad rep …

One other negative of buying the biggest: many hackers consider getting around Symantec and McAfee to be a challenge … and, as outlined in this Business Week article, many are successful.

Choosing From the Rest

Just because they’re the biggest vendors doesn’t mean Symantec and McAfee are your best choices. Quite a few people use other software. How should you make your choice?

One thing I would do is check for a) reviews (not that easy to find), b) test results.

Virus Bulletin awards the VB100% Award to products that a) detect all “In the Wild” viruses during both on-demand and on-access scanning in Virus Bulletin’s comparative tests, b) generate no false positives when scanning a set of clean files. You have to register at the site but it’s free. Note: they do not test every month, and they usually test only one platform (OS) each time.

ICSA Labs certifies antivirus products. A list of the currently certified products is here.

AV-Test.org also tests antivirus products. One interesting spreadsheet on the site indicates how quickly vendors reacted to the Zotob virus that spread earlier this year. It also indicates which products detected the virus proactively, using heuristics. More on this later.

Now, the failure or success of one product over another in the tests does not necessarily mean a product is good or bad. What does count is if a product succeeds or fails consistently.

Now, heuristics. I like to look for antivirus products that have good heuristics, that is, they don’t rely just on virus signatures but also analyze files to determine if the file could possibly be a virus which does not have a signature yet. Of course, this can lead to occasional false positives, but I’d rather have a few (note the emphasis on few) false positives than have a new virus slip by.

There are quite a few second-tier vendors that can be relied on to provide a reliable, effective scanner (I use one of them) … for me, the final decision was based on effectiveness combined with light use of resources (I am a gamer and, although I could turn off a heavy antivirus program during gaming, I prefer not to).

Spyware

I don’t feel it’s necessary to have a background spyware scanner running. I’m just careful and make sure I don’t opt-in or install anything I don’t want. Also, many antivirus products look for spyware by default. I do occasional standalone scans using both Spybot – Search & Destroy and a-squared free edition. Both are free. Both are effective. Usually all I find are some tracking cookies.

Trojans

A Trojan (short for Trojan Horse) differs from a virus in that it cannot replicate itself. Frequently Trojans log your keystrokes or open backdoors to your PC so that the writer can turn your computer into a zombie. I prefer a stand-alone antitrojan program. This limits me, as there aren’t that many vendors. You can look at BOClean (which has saved me more than once!), Trojan Hunter, ewido … and there are a few more. But it’s a smaller, tougher biz than antivirus, TDS-3 recently dropped out of the business.

What Have We Learned?

Honestly, if you don’t go with the big 2 (and you don’t have to) you need to do research at the sites I mentioned, as well as look for reviews. Determine if you can live with a heavier program or if you want a light one. There are even free antivirus programs (such as Avast and AVG) also, with limitations, usually on number of virus definition updates / day. Just be sure you have some protection. The amount of time an unprotected system can be connected to the Internet without infection has dropped to below 20 minutes.

Technorati Tags : ,